Skip to content
From the High Desert book cover

From the High Desert

A Cultural History of Art Bell

Thumbnail for August 27, 2001: Michael Glickman | Crop Glyphs Images - Seth Shostak & Richard C. Hoagland

August 27, 2001: Michael Glickman | Crop Glyphs Images - Seth Shostak & Richard C. Hoagland

Aug 27, 2001
40m
0:00 / 0:00
Art Bell welcomes SETI astronomer Seth Shostak and former NASA advisor Richard C. Hoagland to examine the extraordinary crop glyph that appeared at the Chilbolton Observatory in England. The formation bears a striking resemblance to the 1974 Arecibo message, a three-minute binary transmission beamed into space with an effective radiated power of two trillion watts.

Shostak details the original message's contents, including representations of human DNA, a stick figure of a human, and a map of the solar system. He notes key differences in the crop glyph response: a larger-headed figure replacing the human, three offset planets instead of one, and the addition of silicon to the list of life-essential elements. Despite these intriguing modifications, Shostak remains skeptical, questioning why advanced beings would communicate through grain rather than radio.

Hoagland counters that the silicon addition reflects real biochemistry research unknown to the original message designers. He argues the glyph's precision and placement directly in front of a government observatory suggest something far beyond amateur hoaxing. The two debate whether the formation represents genuine extraterrestrial contact or an elaborate but earthly creation.

Key Moments

  1. The Arecibo signal: 2 trillion watts effective radiated power: Seth Shostak details the technical specs of the 1974 Arecibo SETI broadcast: a million-watt transmitter producing roughly 2 trillion watts of effective radiated power, the strongest signal ever deliberately sent.

  2. Chilbolton glyph appears as apparent reply to Arecibo: Art and Seth examine the Chilbolton crop glyph, agreeing it is unmistakably designed as a response to the 1974 Arecibo message, with a different stick figure, altered solar system, and a new structure replacing the telescope diagram.

  3. Shostak's case against the glyph being a real ET reply: Shostak argues a civilization capable of interstellar travel would not communicate with low-bandwidth grain graffiti, and points out a radio reply would be cheaper, planet-wide, and harder to mistake.

  4. Hoagland: silicon added to biochemistry line is meaningful: Hoagland highlights that the glyph adds silicon to the original CHNOP elements, citing Benjamin Volcani's diatom research at Scripps to argue this represents a sophisticated correction to Earth biochemistry that hoaxers wouldn't know.

  5. Shostak: the Arecibo beam has hit zero stars: Shostak does the freshman astronomy: the Arecibo transmission's two-arcminute beam, after 27 years of travel, has not yet reached a single star within range to allow a reply, making any response statistically improbable.