Skip to content
From the High Desert book cover

From the High Desert

A Cultural History of Art Bell

Thumbnail for September 26, 2002: Cognitive Liberty - Richard Glen Boire

September 26, 2002: Cognitive Liberty - Richard Glen Boire

Sep 26, 2002
40m
0:00 / 0:00
Art Bell speaks with Richard Glen Boire, co-director and legal counsel for the Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics, about the government's authority to regulate consciousness-altering substances. Boire argues that drug prohibition amounts to cognitive censorship, with no constitutional basis for the federal government to dictate which states of mind are permitted and which are criminal. He draws parallels between banning drugs and banning books, noting both are carriers of ideas.

The discussion covers the racist origins of early drug laws, the creative achievements of notable figures who used psychedelics, and the First Amendment implications of restricting religious use of substances like peyote. Boire points to Nobel Prize winner Kary Mullis crediting LSD for his DNA discoveries and physicist Richard Feynman's openness about marijuana use. The conversation is repeatedly disrupted by mysterious phone line disconnections that grow increasingly frequent.

The technical problems eventually force Art to cut the interview short after the lines disconnect dozens of times in rapid succession. Art speculates whether the disruptions are coincidental or deliberate, particularly after they intensify when the Patriot Act is mentioned. He promises to reschedule Boire and shares his own views supporting Nevada's upcoming marijuana legalization ballot measure.

Key Moments

  1. Cognitive liberty defined as freedom of thought: Boire describes the Center for Cognitive Liberty and Ethics as the world's only organization exclusively focused on freedom of thought, watching technologies and pharmaceuticals that could let governments or corporations control or surveil the mind.

  2. Drug prohibition has no constitutional basis: Boire points out that alcohol prohibition required a constitutional amendment, but drug prohibition was enacted with no such amendment, leaving the federal government without legal grounds to outlaw substances people put in their own bodies.

  3. Drug laws as racial control: Boire traces the first U.S. drug laws to racial targeting - opium-smoking bans aimed at Chinese immigrants and early marijuana laws aimed at Black and Hispanic users - arguing drugs were a tool to control particular classes of people.

  4. Kary Mullis credits LSD for his Nobel Prize discovery: Boire cites Kary Mullis, 1993 Nobel laureate in chemistry for PCR, who said he seriously doubts whether he could have come up with his DNA discovery without his use of LSD. Art reacts: 'That's incredible. I didn't know that.'

  5. Drugs and books - both carry forbidden ideas: Art frames psychedelics as a natural enemy of government because they produce 'Imagine'-style thinking. Boire agrees, comparing drugs to books: governments fear ink not for paper but because words carry ideas, and the same is true of consciousness-altering substances.